jon_chaisson: (Default)
[personal profile] jon_chaisson


You know, I used to like the Strokes, until I noticed:

--there's no bass in Julian Casablanca's vocals. It's all treble.
--Dudes, the 70s NYC junkie look went out in the mid-70s.
--[livejournal.com profile] emmalyon and [livejournal.com profile] lynxreign pointed out that they're a "C+ band". In other words, they're doing the minimum, but not trying any harder. I think this video is testament to that. ;)


That said, however...DJ Freelance Hellraiser did a brilliant job back in '02 mixing their also half-assed "Hard to Explain" with Christina Aguilera's "Genie in a Bottle" for one of the best mashups EVER.

Date: 2010-07-04 06:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mekkasimian.livejournal.com
SO WHAT WOULD "TRY HARDER" CONSIST OF? STRING SECTION? GOSPEL CHOIR? JAZZ CHORDS?

=M=

Date: 2010-07-04 06:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] joncwriter.livejournal.com
Nah, just putting a little more effort into their music rather than just phoning it in. ;)

Date: 2010-07-04 06:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mekkasimian.livejournal.com
NO, REALLY: HOW THIS "PHONING IN"? HOW QUANTIFY AMOUNT EFFORT PUT FORTH? MUST ASPIRE TO TECHNICAL PROWESS? MUST WRITE DEEP SERIOUS LYRICS? MUST CHANGE SOUND BETWEEN ALBUMS?

MEK ALWAYS CURIOUS REASON WHEN OUTSIDER INSIST ARTIST "NOT TRY HARD ENOUGH". BASE ON BAND PAST PERFORMANCE? OR PACE OF OTHER BAND IN SIMILAR GENRE?

=M=

Date: 2010-07-04 07:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] joncwriter.livejournal.com
I get where you're coming from...don't get me wrong, I don't loathe this band (as said previously, I find it hard to find a band that completely turns me off to the point of hatred). I think if anything it's shelflife.

I think with this band, at least for me anyway, the thing is "will it stay in my head as a good song"? With pretty much every song on their first album, I didn't love it but it was an interesting and enjoyable listen. Listening to it now, though, just sounds so half-assed. I kinda think the White Stripes are similar in this fashion--interesting to listen to, but the more you listen to it, the more you find problems with it, or the more it just doesn't move you the way it did previously.

[Of course, there are some dated songs out there that I like and/or still love (and I have the LJ posts to prove it!), but that's more due to my own personal and/or emotional connection involved than the emotional prowess of the song, if that makes sense.]

It took me awhile to realize this, why there are some bands out there that I expected to be so much better than the hype or my impressions of them. I was curious as to why I'd bought a cd and really enjoyed it, and listened to it six, twelve months, years down the road and thought, "meh. It's okay, but just doesn't do it for me anymore." I thought originally it might have been an emotional attachment, but it had to be more than that. There's a bit of longevity involved as well. I think now I can be a little pickier with my tastes because I can hear these songs and tell if this is going to be one that gets stuck in my mind in a good way, or if it'll just gather dust on my shelf.

Sadly one of the worst examples of this is Nirvana. I REALLY liked them back in the early 90s, but now I listen to Nevermind and find it very dated. I think it's also that there was SO much better-quality stuff out there at the time that I didn't know about or didn't pay attention to that I'm finding now.
Edited Date: 2010-07-04 07:28 pm (UTC)

Date: 2010-07-04 07:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mekkasimian.livejournal.com
WELL THAT SEEM MORE LIKE EXPECTATION THAN BAND EFFORT.

OR RATHER, "STROKES HAVE TO WORK LOT HARDER TO LIVE UP TO HYPE!"

CERTAINLY SOME ALBUMS/BANDS NOT HOLD UP TO TIME, BUT MEK OKAY WITH THAT. PEOPLE CHANGE, AND SOMETIMES MUSIC NOT FIT AS WELL. BUT ON OTHER HAND, MEK ALSO LATER GET *INTO* BAND THAT PREVIOUSLY DISMISS FOR SURFACE GLOSS OR OTHER HYPE.

SO SEEM LIKE ENTIRE DIFFERENT ISSUE THAN ADVERTISE. MEK DOUBT THAT BANDS CAN BE SUBJECTIVELY, UNIVERSALLY GRADED AS SUCH. OTHERWISE, QUANTIFICATION JUST COME BACK TO: "WHO BETTER: BEATLES OR STONES?"

=M=

Date: 2010-07-04 08:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] joncwriter.livejournal.com
Well, the BEATLES, of course!!! Geez, like you had to ask...! ;)

Date: 2010-07-05 03:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anais-ninja.livejournal.com
I'm also going to object to your assessment here, especially in light of your own admission to liking them before some one talked you out of it.
I won't argue with any of your assertions. They have merit. The Strokes are not an innovative band. Like at all. They are very basic. Instead, I put it to you that their very "basicness" is their very appeal.
I like The Strokes when I want dirty, cheap, raw, funny, hip garage-band style rock. It's a thing I like. It's like wanting your mom's meatloaf. You know it isn't the best thing you've ever eating, but somehow it's classic, somehow it's exactly what you want.
This is generally how I judge music, to be honest. The concept may not translate to another set of ears.

Date: 2010-07-05 03:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anais-ninja.livejournal.com
PS--I totes dig the mash-up.

Date: 2010-07-05 03:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] joncwriter.livejournal.com
You know it isn't the best thing you've ever eating, but somehow it's classic, somehow it's exactly what you want. This is generally how I judge music, to be honest. The concept may not translate to another set of ears.

I totally understand where you're coming from, and I'll be the first to admit that I have very contradictory tastes in music. After all, I embedded an NSYNC song and posted a link to the Spice Girls a few days back. ;)

There's also the issue that I may be taking this meme a bit too seriously--I don't know of any band/song/album/etc that I "hate"--that is, something I can't stand to the point of needing to throw the radio out the window before I hear another note.* I chose to use the word "hate" in this particular meme to mean a band/song/album/etc that really does nothing for me at all, or used to and doesn't anymore.

With the Strokes, I don't exactly hate them, and I'll listen to them when they're on the radio, just like the White Stripes, because the songs are okay, but I don't hold them in the same regard as I used to. I don't hate them, and I don't actively dislike them...they just don't do anything for me anymore, simple as that. ;)

* - The only exception to this was hearing Billy Joel's "Piano Man" on the local classic rock station at work EVERY FRIKKIN' DAY for three months straight without fail. I've since recovered, and can hear it now, as long as I wait another six months for another listen. ;)

Date: 2010-07-05 03:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] joncwriter.livejournal.com
Yeah--Freelance Hellraiser was brilliant with that one! :)

Date: 2010-07-05 04:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] joncwriter.livejournal.com
And I still hold the fact that the vocal mix grates on me because there's no low end to it at all. Again, don't *hate* it, it just hurts my ears. The Chili Peppers' Californication, while a great album, has the same problem for me--very trebley to the point of distraction. ;)

Profile

jon_chaisson: (Default)
jon_chaisson

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
789 10111213
141516 17181920
212223 24252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 31st, 2025 02:20 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios