WELL THAT SEEM MORE LIKE EXPECTATION THAN BAND EFFORT.
OR RATHER, "STROKES HAVE TO WORK LOT HARDER TO LIVE UP TO HYPE!"
CERTAINLY SOME ALBUMS/BANDS NOT HOLD UP TO TIME, BUT MEK OKAY WITH THAT. PEOPLE CHANGE, AND SOMETIMES MUSIC NOT FIT AS WELL. BUT ON OTHER HAND, MEK ALSO LATER GET *INTO* BAND THAT PREVIOUSLY DISMISS FOR SURFACE GLOSS OR OTHER HYPE.
SO SEEM LIKE ENTIRE DIFFERENT ISSUE THAN ADVERTISE. MEK DOUBT THAT BANDS CAN BE SUBJECTIVELY, UNIVERSALLY GRADED AS SUCH. OTHERWISE, QUANTIFICATION JUST COME BACK TO: "WHO BETTER: BEATLES OR STONES?"
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 07:51 pm (UTC)OR RATHER, "STROKES HAVE TO WORK LOT HARDER TO LIVE UP TO HYPE!"
CERTAINLY SOME ALBUMS/BANDS NOT HOLD UP TO TIME, BUT MEK OKAY WITH THAT. PEOPLE CHANGE, AND SOMETIMES MUSIC NOT FIT AS WELL. BUT ON OTHER HAND, MEK ALSO LATER GET *INTO* BAND THAT PREVIOUSLY DISMISS FOR SURFACE GLOSS OR OTHER HYPE.
SO SEEM LIKE ENTIRE DIFFERENT ISSUE THAN ADVERTISE. MEK DOUBT THAT BANDS CAN BE SUBJECTIVELY, UNIVERSALLY GRADED AS SUCH. OTHERWISE, QUANTIFICATION JUST COME BACK TO: "WHO BETTER: BEATLES OR STONES?"
=M=