Deep Throat and Eerie Similarities
Jun. 2nd, 2005 08:43 amOkay, so maybe I'm reading into things, but I've been following a lot of the news lately in regards to the revelation that former FBI 2nd-in-command Mark Felt was in fact Deep Throat. Fascinating story, really. Pretty much as exciting and creepy as the movie All the President's Men made it out to be.
I'm seeing a few, well, maybe not outright "forget-history-you're-doomed-to-repeat-it" similarities, but perhaps "this-pattern-seems-awfully-familiar" similarities. To wit:
From Bob Woodward's article from today's Washington Post:
At the time, pre-Watergate, there was little or no public knowledge of the vast pushing, shoving and outright acrimony between the Nixon White House and Hoover's FBI. The Watergate investigations later revealed that in 1970 a young White House aide named Tom Charles Huston had come up with a plan to authorize the CIA, the FBI and military intelligence units to intensify electronic surveillance of "domestic security threats," authorize illegal opening of mail, and lift the restrictions on surreptitious entries or break-ins to gather intelligence.
(For the record, Huston's plan was favored by Nixon, but shunned by Hoover, who thought that such actions were the FBI's bread and butter, and didn't want any competition. Interesting, huh? ;) Nixon nixed the plan four days later.)
Another gem, also from Woodward's article:
There is little doubt Felt thought the Nixon team were Nazis. During this period, he had to stop efforts by others in the bureau to "identify every member of every hippie commune" in the Los Angeles area, for example, or to open a file on every member of Students for a Democratic Society.
Sure, we all know now that that was going on then. Every cynic and conspiracy buff knows that this is part and parcel of any administration. I'm just wondering if our current administration is doing such things with people who are of the Muslim faith right now.
Patriot Act, anyone? ;)
More soon when I have the time...
(all quotes from Bob Woodward (c)2005 Bob Woodward/Washington Post. :) )
I'm seeing a few, well, maybe not outright "forget-history-you're-doomed-to-repeat-it" similarities, but perhaps "this-pattern-seems-awfully-familiar" similarities. To wit:
From Bob Woodward's article from today's Washington Post:
At the time, pre-Watergate, there was little or no public knowledge of the vast pushing, shoving and outright acrimony between the Nixon White House and Hoover's FBI. The Watergate investigations later revealed that in 1970 a young White House aide named Tom Charles Huston had come up with a plan to authorize the CIA, the FBI and military intelligence units to intensify electronic surveillance of "domestic security threats," authorize illegal opening of mail, and lift the restrictions on surreptitious entries or break-ins to gather intelligence.
(For the record, Huston's plan was favored by Nixon, but shunned by Hoover, who thought that such actions were the FBI's bread and butter, and didn't want any competition. Interesting, huh? ;) Nixon nixed the plan four days later.)
Another gem, also from Woodward's article:
There is little doubt Felt thought the Nixon team were Nazis. During this period, he had to stop efforts by others in the bureau to "identify every member of every hippie commune" in the Los Angeles area, for example, or to open a file on every member of Students for a Democratic Society.
Sure, we all know now that that was going on then. Every cynic and conspiracy buff knows that this is part and parcel of any administration. I'm just wondering if our current administration is doing such things with people who are of the Muslim faith right now.
Patriot Act, anyone? ;)
More soon when I have the time...
(all quotes from Bob Woodward (c)2005 Bob Woodward/Washington Post. :) )
no subject
Date: 2005-06-02 01:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-02 01:32 pm (UTC)This just in...
Date: 2005-06-02 05:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-02 01:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-02 04:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-02 04:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-02 05:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-02 05:29 pm (UTC)Okay then...
Date: 2005-06-02 06:05 pm (UTC)Storywise? Made one hell of a movie, and it's a fascinating bit of history.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-02 04:52 pm (UTC)Or maybe an historian or someone that wasn't sent to jail because of him.
I'm wondering if next we ask Saddam how he felt about the invasion, was it a good thing? How did Hiter feel about D-Day? Did he agree that it helped Europe in the long run? Did Noriega approve of Bush Sr. kidnapping him from leading Panama? Are the Cardinals happy for the Red Sox? How do the executives at Enron feel about the whistleblowers at their company?
Now there's news.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-02 05:02 pm (UTC)Damn, it sounds like I'm back in a Mass Comm class in college again... :p
Seriously, we already know how historians/those not involved feel about it. Sure, they could have thrown a few more people in there to balance it out (I'm not getting into that argument...), but just the fact that they got those voices at all is interesting enough.
Maybe it's just me, but I don't see NPR as leaning towards the right. I just listen to it. Period. :p
no subject
Date: 2005-06-02 05:11 pm (UTC)Here, let me ask you an equally revealing question. When you drop something, which way does it fall?
no subject
Date: 2005-06-02 06:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-02 06:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-02 06:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-03 04:04 am (UTC)As my Dad always says, the newspaper business (applies to all media) is about selling papers, not distributing news, especially.
Try www.indymedia.org, too!
no subject
Date: 2005-06-02 05:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-03 01:37 am (UTC)How long have you been sleeping with *me*??
Do you see the correlation? :-P
no subject
Date: 2005-06-02 06:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-02 06:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-03 04:07 am (UTC)I may listen to them from time to time, but just because they are Public Radio doesn't mean that they are any better...ANY MORE.